Louis
Hotte Département de science
économique/Department of Economics Université d'Ottawa/University of
Ottawa 120, Université
(bureau 9048) Ottawa, Canada K1N 6N5 Tél: 1 (613) 562-5800 ext.
1692 louis.hotte@uottawa.ca
Louis
Hotte is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa.
He has published on issues of natural resource use, property rights
and conflict; the political-economy of trade and the environment; and
on the economics of crime and private protection. Louis has conducted a
household survey in Costa Rica investigating the
use of formal banking by women as a protection measure. His work
appeared in the Journal
of Development Economics, Oxford Economic Papers,
the Canadian Journal of
Economics, Public
Choice, Resource and Energy Economics, and Environmental and Resource
Economics. Louis was invited to contribute a chapter for
the Encyclopedia of
Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics by
Elsevier Science. His work has attracted mention by scholars in both
the Economics and Law
literatures. He has been Associate Editor for the journal Environment and Development
Economics at Cambridge University Press. He previously
held a joint appointment at the Economics
and Law Faculties of the University of Namur in Belgium, and
has
taught graduate students at the Université Catholique de
Louvain, the Université d'Auvergne, the
Université de
Rouen, the Toulouse School of Economics, and the Université
des Antilles.
Recent work:Peaceability
and Conflict (with Elise Critoph, uOttawa WP 2022)
Individuals have different psychological predispositions for conflict,
or peaceabilities.
Whether they
actually engage in conflict depends on the (institutional) context. We
show how peaceabilities and context
interact when players differ in three ways: peaceful shares, fighting
strengths, and peaceabilities. The
context produces two basic behaviors, opportunistic or matching; behavior,
in turn, determines if higher
peaceability (or its probability) increases the likelihood of conflict.
Consequently, for the same change in
peaceabilities, the context can produce opposite predictions regarding
peace and conflict.