Louis Hotte
Département de science économique/Department of Economics
Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa
120, Université (bureau 9048)
Ottawa, Canada K1N 6N5
Tél:  1 (613) 562-5800 ext. 1692
louis.hotte@uottawa.ca

Louis Hotte is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa. He has published on issues of natural resource use, property rights and conflict; the political-economy of trade and the environment; and on the economics of crime and private protection. Louis has conducted a household survey in Costa Rica investigating the use of formal banking by women as a protection measure. His work appeared in the Journal of Development Economics, Oxford Economic Papers, the Canadian Journal of Economics, Public Choice, Resource and Energy Economics, and Environmental and Resource Economics. Louis was invited to contribute a chapter for the Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics by Elsevier Science. His work has attracted mention by scholars in both the Economics and Law literatures. He has been Associate Editor for the journal Environment and Development Economics at Cambridge University Press. He previously held a joint appointment at the Economics and Law Faculties of the University of Namur in Belgium, and has taught graduate students at the Université Catholique de Louvain, the Université d'Auvergne, the Université de Rouen, the Toulouse School of Economics, and the Université des Antilles.


Recent work: Peaceability and Conflict (with Elise Critoph, uOttawa WP 2022)
Individuals have different psychological predispositions for conflict, or peaceabilities. Whether they actually engage in conflict depends on the (institutional) context. We show how peaceabilities and context interact when players differ in three ways: peaceful shares, fighting strengths, and peaceabilities. The context produces two basic behaviors, opportunistic or matching; behavior, in turn, determines if higher peaceability (or its probability) increases the likelihood of conflict. Consequently, for the same change in peaceabilities, the context can produce opposite predictions regarding peace and conflict.